Abstract
Review articles are essential for the progress of science. Consequently, they need to be reliable. This is, however, not always the case, as shown by a review article dealing with the application of dry needling to the rehabilitation of patients with spasticity. This example and its follow-up show not only that various types of errors may occur in one single review article, but also that that not all medical authors feel themselves responsible for reliable information. Analysis of medical publications about the COVID-19 pandemic indicates how and why unreliable medical publications may originate. The various possible types of errors and incorrect information in such articles are indicated and discussed, and measures that may help to reduce the number of such errors – thus increasing the reliability of medical articles and particularly review articles – are presented.
Keywords
Review articles, Scientific reliability, Scientific fraud, Editorial responsibility, Peer review, COVID-19 pandemic