Loading

Commentary Open Access
Volume 2 | Issue 1 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.46439/Psychiatry.2.022

Commentary: Patient satisfaction with and use of telemental health services in the perinatal period: a survey study

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
+ Affiliations - Affiliations

*Corresponding Author

Ackerman M, Marra.Ackerman@nyulangone.org

Received Date: September 21, 2021

Accepted Date: January 28, 2022

Commentary

We conducted a survey study assessing patient’s utilization of and satisfaction with telemental health (TMH) in the perinatal period. Our survey was conducted from March 2018 to June 2019, notably before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants in our study used TMH services, with both audio and video, across the second and third trimester of pregnancy and the first year postpartum. Nearly half of our study participants used TMH to see their provider within the first two weeks post-partum. A majority of participants agreed that TMH improved their access to healthcare services; saved them time traveling to a hospital or clinic; was easy to use and to learn; and provided a satisfying means of accessing mental healthcare. In sum, our study illustrated that even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, TMH was a highly accepted and satisfactory method of delivering mental health care to peri-partum women when offered as an alternative to in-person or telephone sessions [1]. 

The pandemic has further demonstrated that TMH can serve as a mainstream modality for outpatient psychiatric treatment. A McKinsey COVID-19 consumer survey in 2021 noted that overall telehealth use was approximately 78 times higher during spring 2020 and the onset of the pandemic. Since then, telehealth utilization has stabilized at levels 38 times higher than before the pandemic [2]. Mental health providers are uniquely able to utilize tele at a significantly higher level (30-50%) as compared to other specialties (up to 17%) [2]. Since providers and patients have had the opportunity to engage in tele services on such a wide scale for the past year and a half, much of the patient population has adjusted to this modality as an ongoing method to engage in treatment, and providers have developed core competencies in delivering care via tele. A nationwide multisite survey in 2020 showed that the majority of patients had an overall positive experience with video or phone modalities (82%) and found the tele sessions just as helpful as in person sessions (63.6%). Noted benefits included the lack of commute and increased flexibility; whereas the downsides included feeling less connected to the provider and missing the in-person environment. Most patients (64.2%) would consider continuing with tele treatment post-pandemic [3].

TMH provides the additional benefit of improving treatment engagement. A cross-sectional study of outpatient adult telepsychiatry appointments showed that the rate of attending a telepsychiatry visit was 6.68 times higher than an in-person visit during the pandemic. In contrast, the rate of completing a telepsychiatry visit pre-pandemic was three times the odds of completing an in person visit [4]. This is particularly pertinent for perinatal patients and their newborns who are identified as high risk for SARS-COV2 infection. TMH offers continuity of care within the patient’s home environment. Additionally, many obstetricians are using telemedicine to provide at-home antenatal care including fetal monitoring; to deliver childbirth and lactation-related education; and specialist consults [5].

Since the pandemic began, regulations and licensure restrictions have eased to allow for continued treatment of patients via TMH. One international survey of telepsychiatry experts highlighted the liberalization of regulations during the pandemic on an international scale which vary widely but generally eased restrictions on prescribing practices and allowed for greater parity with insurance reimbursement for tele treatment [6]. Advocacy is ongoing to reduce roadblocks to TMH post-pandemic to preserve continuity of care. In the United States, as of May 2021 at least 25 telehealth bills have been introduced in Congress including licensing requirement changes [7]. And in July 2021, 430 organizations sent letters to Congress emphasizing the importance of permanent telehealth reform. These reforms include removing restrictions on TMH services [8].

Since our pre-pandemic survey study on TMH in the perinatal population, the role and use of TMH has burgeoned to meet the demand for mental health treatment during a global health crisis [9]. The threat of infection and necessity of social distancing practices has reduced access to social support, particularly for high risk pregnant women. Increased depressive and anxiety symptoms have been reported in pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic [10-12]. In this setting, virtual resources [13]; increased social connections and networks, [14]; and TMH treatment have emerged as possible antidotes. Studies have now demonstrated successful use of TMH in rural peripartum populations [15] as well as to connect patients and obstetric providers to perinatal mental health experts [16]. An ongoing study seeks to compare non-specialist and specialist providers, as well as in-person and telemedicine treatment of depression and anxiety in the perinatal population [17]. These advances offer promise for increasing access and delivery of mental health treatment to perinatal women worldwide.

References

1. Ackerman M, Greenwald E, Noulas P, Ahn C. Patient Satisfaction with and Use of Telemental Health Services in the Perinatal Period: a Survey Study. Psychiatric Quarterly. 2021 Jan 3:1-9.

2. Bestsennyy O, Gilbert G, Harris A, Rost J. Telehealth: A quarter-trillion-dollar post-Covid 19 reality? McKinsey and Company. July 9, 2021. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/telehealth-a-quarter-trillion-dollar-post-covid-19-reality

3. Guinart D, Marcy P, Hauser M, Dwyer M, Kane JM. Patient attitudes toward telepsychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide, multisite survey. JMIR Mental Health. 2020;7(12):e24761.

4. Avalone L, Barron C, King C, Linn-Walton R, Lau J, McQuistion HL, et al. Rapid telepsychiatry implementation during COVID-19: increased attendance at the largest health system in the United States. Psychiatric Services. 2021 Jun;72(6):708-11.

5. Alves DS, Times VC, da Silva ÉMA, Melo PSA, Novaes MA. Advances in obstetric telemonitoring: a systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2020 Feb;134:104004.

6. Kinoshita S, Cortright K, Crawford A, Mizuno Y, Yoshida K, Hilty D, et al. Changes in telepsychiatry regulations during the COVID-19 pandemic: 17 countries and regions' approaches to an evolving healthcare landscape. Psychological Medicine. 2020 Nov 27:1-8.

7. Brownstein HFS. Potential Congressional Action on Telehealth. JDSupra. May 6, 2021. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/potential-congressional-action-on-4341089/

8. 430 Organizations Urge Congress to Address ‘Telehealth Cliff’. American Telemedicine Association Press Release, July 26, 2021. https://www.americantelemed.org/press-releases/7-26-telehealthcliff/

9. Lok KY, Ko RWT, Fan HSL, Wong JY, Choi EP, Shek NWM, et al. International survey on fear and childbirth experience in pregnancy and the postpartum period during the COVID-19 pandemic: study protocol. BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 3;11(8):e050132.

10. Berthelot N, Lemieux R, Garon‐Bissonnette J, Drouin‐Maziade C, Martel É, Maziade M. Uptrend in distress and psychiatric symptomatology in pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2020 Jul;99(7):848-55.

11. Wu Y, Zhang C, Liu H, Duan C, Li C, Fan J, et al. Perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms of pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in China. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020 Aug 1;223(2):240-e1.

12. Layton H, Owais S, Savoy CD, Van Lieshout RJ. Depression, Anxiety, and Mother-Infant Bonding in Women Seeking Treatment for Postpartum Depression Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 6;82(4):21m13874.

13. Bramante A, Brenna V, Mauri M, Spinelli M. Psychopathology of pregnancy and postpartum during the Covid-19 pandemic: a small guide. https://marcesociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Bramante-Spinelli-English.pdf

14. Myers S, Emmott EH. Communication Across Maternal Social Networks During England's First National Lockdown and Its Association With Postnatal Depressive Symptoms. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021 May 11;12:1583.

15. Gopalan P, Auster L, Brockman I, Shenai N. Telemedicine Psychiatric Consultation on an Inpatient Obstetrical Labor and Delivery Unit. Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 20:S2667-2960(21)00075-6.

16. Worley LLM, Wise-Ehlers A. Telepsychiatry in Obstetrics. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2020 Jun;47(2):333-340.

17. Singla DR, Meltzer-Brody SE, Silver RK, Vigod SN, Kim JJ, La Porte LM, et al. Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) through non-specialist providers and telemedicine: a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Dec;22(1):1-5.

Author Information X