Loading

Commentary Open Access
Volume 5 | Issue 1 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.46439/biomedres.5.051

Recent advances and challenges in brain tumor segmentation utilizing α-expansion graph cut

  • 1Computer & Information Systems Department, Rafik Hariri University, Mechref, Lebanon
  • 2Faculty of Economics & Business Administration, Lebanese University, Lebanon
  • 3LIA Laboratory, Doctoral School of Sciences & Technology Lebanese University, Lebanon
  • 4Department of Computer Information Systems, Lebanese University, Lebanon
  • 5UNIHAVRE, LMAH, FR-CNRS-3335, ISCN, Normandie Universit., Le Havre, France
  • 6UNILEHAVRE, Institut Suprieur d’Etudes Logistiques (ISEL), Normandie Universit., Le Havre, France
  • 7Department of Computer Science, Beirut Arab University, Tripoli, Lebanon
+ Affiliations - Affiliations

*Corresponding Author

Roaa Soloh, solohrk@rhu.edu.lb

Received Date: July 29, 2024

Accepted Date: September 16, 2024

Abstract

This commentary summarizes our team's recent study, "Brain Tumor Segmentation Based on α-Expansion Graph Cut," by discussing the recent advances in deep learning integration, multimodality imaging, and real-time segmentation tools. It also highlights the strengths of the method in energy minimization and noise handling done throughout the study, while it addresses the challenges related to scalability, deep learning integration, and generalization. This brief overview provides insights into current advances and future directions in brain tumor segmentation.

Introduction

Manual segmentation is a time-consuming process, while computer-based segmentation especially for brain tumors is considered crucial for effective diagnosis and treatment planning. The recent publication “Brain Tumor Segmentation Based on α-Expansion Graph Cut” has highlighted the potential of the α-Expansion Graph Cut method in this area [1]. Throughout this commentary, we aim to expand the discussion by addressing recent advances, analyzing current challenges, and examining the broader implications of this segmentation technique.

Brain Tumor Segmentation Using α-Expansion Graph Cut

In this section, we tend to clarify the algorithm used and its importance influenced by the available latest developments in this field. The approach is based on graph theory, where the 2D MRI images are represented as weighted graphs, where each pixel in the MRI slices is treated as a vertex in a graph, with edges connecting adjacent pixels. The edges are weighted to reflect the relationship between neighboring pixels. Then the segmentation is formulated as an energy minimization problem, where the goal is to find a segmentation that minimizes a defined energy function. We would refer the readers for full details about this approach to the article [1]. The results for this study show an average of more than 0.8 for dice similarity, and more than 0.75 for Jaccard index. And this is normal due to the complex structure of some brain MRIs.

Latest Developments in Brain Tumor Segmentation

Significant improvements in brain tumor segmentation techniques have been reported in recent years, mainly due to the widespread applications in deep learning and advanced image processing algorithms. Among the notable improvements are:

Deep learning integration

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs): It improved the medical image analysis task, specifically for brain tumor segmentation. Architectures like U-Net have become the norm because of their ability to capture fine details and context simultaneously [2,3]. For example, the U-Net++ and Attention U-Net variants improved segmentation efficiency by introducing nested and attention methods [2,4]. Nevertheless, the dependency on large datasets in the medical context is considered time-consuming and resource-intensive. In addition to the concern, whenever these algorithms are tested on new datasets.

Hybrid models: The researchers have been developing hybrid models that integrate classic methods, such as Graph Cuts and CNNs. For example, post-processing CNN outputs with Graph Cut improvements have been demonstrated to increase boundary delineation and reduce false positives in tumor segmentation [2,5]. Despite this advancement, hybrid models because of their huge complexity, lead to high computational costs along with overfitting. These drawbacks are considered crucial for the success of such implementations in the clinics.

Multi-modality imaging

Combining MRI with PET or CT: Used for a thorough view of the tumor and its surroundings. MRI provides an ideal view for soft tissue contrast, whereas PET highlights metabolic activity and CT provides specific anatomical information [6,7]. The studies show that combining these modalities with the well-known algorithms considerably improves segmentation accuracy [6-10]. Researchers focus on techniques such as multi-scale fusion and cross-modality attention processes [11,12]. Also, ensuring the consistency of image quality and alignment across modalities is critical, as discrepancies can negatively impact segmentation performance.

Automated and real-time segmentation 

Improvements in computational power: The increase in computer capacity enables automated and real-time segmentation. The growth of high-performance computing and GPUs has enabled the creation of automatic segmentation programs capable of real-time analysis [13-15]. These technologies, which use deep learning and tailored algorithms, are critical for clinical contexts [16-18]. However, the reliance on computational power introduces concerns regarding scalability and cost, especially in resource-limited environments. Additionally, while real-time segmentation is valuable, it often comes at the expense of accuracy, especially in complex cases where precise delineation is critical. Balancing the need for speed with the demand for high accuracy remains a significant challenge in the development of these technologies.

Analyze the Issues Addressed

The α-Expansion Graph Cut approach overcomes key challenges in brain tumor segmentation.

Energy minimization

Iterative optimization: The α-Expansion algorithm optimizes and enlarges segmentation regions along with minimizing the energy functions. This technique effectively balances data accuracy and works on smoothing the constraints, which results in accurate segmentation. Recent studies have demonstrated that this method is more effective than the traditional graph-cutting approaches, particularly in complex structures like brain tumors [3,19,20].

Handling noise and artifacts

Robustness toward imperfections: Medical images are often affected by various imperfections, such as noise and defects, due to factors like patient movement and imaging constraints. The α-Expansion Graph Cut approach employs robust energy functions to minimize the impact of these defects [21,22]. Recent studies have concentrated on enhancing the robustness of this approach by integrating an adaptive energy term and noise-aware algorithms [23,24]. This adaptive method aims to enhance the ability of image processing techniques to handle the inherent challenges associated with medical imaging data.

Computational efficiency

Optimized algorithms: The α-Expansion Graph Cut algorithm is optimized for efficiency, which makes it appropriate for big datasets and real-time applications [25-27]. Recent modifications to algorithmic optimization, such as parallel processing and hierarchical graph cuts, have enhanced its computational performance, making it suitable for use in time-sensitive clinical processes [28,29].

Challenges and Future Directions

Although α-Expansion Graph Cut method has advantages, this method faces several challenges, and we did some recommendations:

Scalability

Large-scale: While the α-Expansion Graph Cut method is a powerful technique, it is quite challenging to scale up with respect to very large-scale datasets or high-resolution images. Most of the existing works concentrate on hierarchical approaches and multi-resolution techniques, where the segmentation is performed at lower resolutions followed by refining it in higher ones for a trade-off between accuracy and computational load [30-32].

Future research directions

To improve scalability further integrating parallel processing techniques and distributed computing frameworks could be considered. Furthermore, algorithms with the ability to alter resolution on-the-fly like Feldkamp–Davis–Kress, depending on whether parts of images are more difficult than others could improve performance as well as reduce resource consumption.

Integration with deep learning

Seamless integration: Combining α-Expansion Graph Cut with deep learning algorithms can increase segmentation accuracy. Seamlessly, incorporating these strategies is difficult [7,33]. Hybrid models must be carefully built to exploit the merits of both approaches while avoiding additional computational loads. Recent research has focused on developing end-to-end trainable frameworks that incorporate the graph-cut principles into deep learning systems [4,34,35].

Future research directions:  Researchers might express graph-cut principles directly within deep learning architectures, resulting into lightweight and end-to-end trainable frameworks. Moreover, research on the application of reinforcement learning for intelligent optimization in integration process design may provide more efficient and general models for different clinical scenarios.

Generalization

Robustness across modalities: It is crucial to ensure that the segmentation method applies to a variety of imaging modalities and patient demographics [36,37]. Developing models that can handle differences in imaging modalities, scanner types, and patient demographics is critical for wider clinical use [38-40]. Domain adaptation, transfer learning, and comprehensive multi-center validation are some of the algorithms being investigated to improve generalization [41].

Future research directions: Sophisticated domain adaptation and transfer learning approaches. In addition, conducting multicenter validation including national and international sites can offer a more exhaustive review of the validity of this method. In future work, researchers could explore the development of modality-agnostic frameworks with automatic adaptation to different characteristics in imaging data without a need for extensive retraining.

Ethical considerations and interpretability

Clinical decision-making: As such, advancing such kinds of automated segmentation techniques, the question arises as to whether it is ethical to introduce such a tool into a clinical decision-making tool. However, the interpretability of these models remains crucial so that the clinicians can have faith in them and comprehend them.

Future research direction: In similar contexts researchers should consider working on improving the interpretability of the models in the future. This can lead to the invention of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) frameworks that would help explain which features or part of the image was used to make a given segmentation decision. It will, therefore, be necessary to understand how other areas of health-care provision might be benefitting from ethical opportunities created by employing automated segmentation.

Hybrid architectures

Combining strengths: Research on integrating graph-based methods with deep learning has been explored to some extent; however, there is much more work to be done in developing hybrid models that are optimal for different use cases.

Future research direction: It might be appropriate to explore the possibility of designing adaptable graph-based and/or neural network frameworks which comprise basic building blocks that can be applied and reconfigured in function of the complexity and type of tumor. Exploring how such hybrid systems work under different clinical scenarios, thus how the real-time constraints and image qualities may affect segmentation, may develop more powerful and generalized segmentation techniques.

Summary

In the field of brain tumor segmentation, the α-Expansion Graph Cut approach is considered as major advancement. The latest developments have brought attention to its potential, and continuing studies are working to solve its drawbacks. While this approach is combined with deep learning and other cutting-edge methods, brain tumor segmentation appears to have a promising future. Further research in this direction will certainly result in segmentation techniques that are more precise, effective, and useful in clinical settings overcoming many drawbacks for state-of-art work.

References

1. Soloh R, Alabboud H, Shahin A, Yassine A, El Chakik A. Brain Tumor Segmentation Based on α‐Expansion Graph Cut. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology. 2024 Jul;34(4):e23132.

2. Aboelenein NM, Songhao P, Koubaa A, Noor A, Afifi A. HTTU-Net: Hybrid Two Track U-Net for automatic brain tumor segmentation. IEEE Access. 2020 May 29;8:101406-15.

3. Hu YC, Mageras G, Grossberg M. Multi-class medical image segmentation using one-vs-rest graph cuts and majority voting. Journal of Medical Imaging. 2021 May 1;8(3):034003.

4. Liu Z, Tong L, Chen L, Jiang Z, Zhou F, Zhang Q, et al. Deep learning based brain tumor segmentation: a survey. Complex & Intelligent Systems. 2023 Feb;9(1):1001-26.

5. Jyothi P, Singh AR. Deep learning models and traditional automated techniques for brain tumor segmentation in MRI: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review. 2023 Apr;56(4):2923-69.

6. Brendle C, Maier C, Bender B, Schittenhelm J, Paulsen F, Renovanz M, et al. Impact of 18F-FET PET/MRI on Clinical Management of Brain Tumor Patients. J Nucl Med. 2022 Apr;63(4):522-527.

7. Ren J, Eriksen JG, Nijkamp J, Korreman SS. Comparing different CT, PET and MRI multi-modality image combinations for deep learning-based head and neck tumor segmentation. Acta Oncologica. 2021 Nov 2;60(11):1399-406.

8. Dogra J, Sood M, Jain S. An Automatic Glioma Detection and Extraction Framework for the Removal of Shrinkage in Segmentation (Doctoral dissertation, Jaypee University of Information Technology, Solan, HP).

9. Martin O, Schaarschmidt BM, Kirchner J, Suntharalingam S, Grueneisen J, Demircioglu A, et al. PET/MRI versus PET/CT for whole-body staging: results from a single-center observational study on 1,003 sequential examinations. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2020 Aug 1;61(8):1131-6.

10. Romeo V, Clauser P, Rasul S, Kapetas P, Gibbs P, Baltzer PA, et al. AI-enhanced simultaneous multiparametric 18F-FDG PET/MRI for accurate breast cancer diagnosis. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2022 Jan;49(2):596-608.

11. Jiang X, Zhang Y, Liu W, Gao J, Liu J, Zhang Y, et al. Hyperspectral image classification with CapsNet and Markov random fields. IEEE Access. 2020 Oct 6;8:191956-68.

12. Zhang D, Huang G, Zhang Q, Han J, Han J, Yu Y. Cross-modality deep feature learning for brain tumor segmentation. Pattern Recognition. 2021 Feb 1;110:107562.

13. Cinar N, Ozcan A, Kaya M. A hybrid DenseNet121-UNet model for brain tumor segmentation from MR Images. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2022 Jul 1;76:103647.

14. Ekström S, Pilia M, Kullberg J, Ahlström H, Strand R, Malmberg F. Faster dense deformable image registration by utilizing both CPU and GPU. Journal of Medical Imaging. 2021 Jan 1;8(1):014002.

15. Khairandish MO, Sharma M, Jain V, Chatterjee JM, Jhanjhi NZ. A hybrid CNN-SVM threshold segmentation approach for tumor detection and classification of MRI brain images. Irbm. 2022 Aug 1;43(4):290-9.

16. Jia Z, Chen D. Brain tumor identification and classification of MRI images using deep learning Techniques. IEEE Access. 2020 Aug 13.

17. Sanaat A, Shiri I, Ferdowsi S, Arabi H, Zaidi H. Robust-Deep: a method for increasing brain imaging datasets to improve deep learning models’ performance and robustness. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2022 Jun;35(3):469-81.

18. Ullah F, Ansari SU, Hanif M, Ayari MA, Chowdhury ME, Khandakar AA, et al. Brain MR image enhancement for tumor segmentation using 3D U-Net. Sensors. 2021 Nov 12;21(22):7528.

19. Estienne T, Lerousseau M, Vakalopoulou M, Alvarez Andres E, Battistella E, Carré A, et al. Deep Learning-Based Concurrent Brain Registration and Tumor Segmentation. Front Comput Neurosci. 2020 Mar 20;14:17.

20. Rajendran S, Rajagopal SK, Thanarajan T, Shankar K, Kumar S, Alsubaie NM, et al. Automated segmentation of brain tumor MRI images using deep learning. IEEE Access. 2023 Jun 20;11:64758-68.

21. Decazes P, Hinault P, Veresezan O, Thureau S, Gouel P, Vera P. Trimodality PET/CT/MRI and Radiotherapy: A Mini-Review. Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 4;10:614008.

22. Ramesh S, Sasikala S, Paramanandham N. Segmentation and classification of brain tumors using modified median noise filter and deep learning approaches. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2021 Mar;80(8):11789-813.

23. Magadza T, Viriri S. Deep learning for brain tumor segmentation: a survey of state-of-the-art. Journal of Imaging. 2021 Jan 29;7(2):19.

24. Ranjbarzadeh R, Bagherian Kasgari A, Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi S, Anari S, Naseri M, Bendechache M. Brain tumor segmentation based on deep learning and an attention mechanism using MRI multi-modalities brain images. Scientific Reports. 2021 May 25;11(1):1-7.

25. Billot B, Magdamo C, Cheng Y, Arnold SE, Das S, Iglesias JE. Robust machine learning segmentation for large-scale analysis of heterogeneous clinical brain MRI datasets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 28;120(9):e2216399120.

26. Boone L, Biparva M, Mojiri Forooshani P, Ramirez J, Masellis M, Bartha R, et al. ROOD-MRI: Benchmarking the robustness of deep learning segmentation models to out-of-distribution and corrupted data in MRI. Neuroimage. 2023 Sep;278:120289.

27. Daimary D, Bora MB, Amitab K, Kandar D. Brain tumor segmentation from MRI images using hybrid convolutional neural networks. Procedia Computer Science. 2020 Jan 1;167:2419-28.

28. Fang F, Yao Y, Zhou T, Xie G, Lu J. Self-Supervised Multi-Modal Hybrid Fusion Network for Brain Tumor Segmentation. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022 Nov;26(11):5310-5320.

29. Hossain E, Hossain MS, Hossain MS, Al Jannat S, Huda M, Alsharif S, et al. Brain Tumor Auto-Segmentation on Multimodal Imaging Modalities Using Deep Neural Network. Computers, Materials & Continua. 2022 Sep 1;72(3).

30. Balamurugan T, Gnanamanoharan E. Brain tumor segmentation and classification using hybrid deep CNN with LuNetClassifier. Neural Computing and Applications. 2023 Feb;35(6):4739-53.

31. Karayegen G, Aksahin MF. Brain tumor prediction on MR images with semantic segmentation by using deep learning network and 3D imaging of tumor region. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2021 Apr 1;66:102458.

32. Li G, Sun J, Song Y, Qu J, Zhu Z, Khosravi MR. Real-time classification of brain tumors in MRI images with a convolutional operator-based hidden Markov model. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing. 2021 Aug 1:1-3.

33. Kumar S, Singh JN, Kaur I. Brain Tumor MRI Image Segmentation and Noise Filtering using FCNN [J]. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE). 2020;9(5):844-7.

34. Saman S, Narayanan SJ. Active contour model driven by optimized energy functionals for MR brain tumor segmentation with intensity inhomogeneity correction. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2021 Jun;80(14):21925-54.

35. Soomro TA, Zheng L, Afifi AJ, Ali A, Soomro S, Yin M, et al. Image segmentation for MR brain tumor detection using machine learning: a review. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering. 2022 Jun 23;16:70-90.

36. Ali S, Li J, Pei Y, Khurram R, Rehman KU, Mahmood T. A comprehensive survey on brain tumor diagnosis using deep learning and emerging hybrid techniques with multi-modal MR image. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 2022 Nov;29(7):4871-96.

37. Srinivasu PN, Balas VE. Self-Learning Network-based segmentation for real-time brain MR images through HARIS. PeerJ Computer Science. 2021 Aug 2;7:e654.

38. Mohammed E, Hassaan M, Amin S, Ebied HM. Brain tumor segmentation: a comparative analysis. InThe International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision 2021 May 29 (pp. 505-514). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

39. Seifert R, Kersting D, Rischpler C, Opitz M, Kirchner J, Pabst KM, et al. Clinical use of PET/MR in oncology: an update. InSeminars in Nuclear Medicine 2022 May 1 (Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 356-364). WB Saunders.

40. Tripathi S, Verma A, Sharma N. Automatic segmentation of brain tumour in MR images using an enhanced deep learning approach. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization. 2021 Mar 4;9(2):121-30.

41. Zhou T, Ruan S, Hu H. A literature survey of MR-based brain tumor segmentation with missing modalities. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. 2023 Mar 1;104:102167.

Author Information X